Joliet Street Railway Co. v. McCarthy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that petitioner “was not entitled to mandamus relief because the defendants did not owe him a clear nondiscretionary duty” to investigate his complaints of criminal activity
• finding that the FBI Director and Attorney General had no duty to investigate the plaintiff’s complaints
• finding that the FBI Director and Attorney General had no duty to investigate the plaintiff’s complaints
• “The PLRA applies to mandamus petitions that seek relief analogous to civil complaints under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.”
• “The PLRA applies to mandamus petitions that seek relief analogous to civil complaints under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.”
• “The PLRA applies to mandamus petitions that seek relief analogous to civil complaints under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).