Joint Council of Teamsters 37 v. Bureau of Labor & Industries

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the validity of an expired or superseded rule is not ‘kept alive’ for mootness purposes by the fact that the superseded rule may have some continuing effect on the application or validity of a current rule”
• holding that “the validity of an expired or superseded rule is not ‘kept alive’ for mootness purposes by the fact that the superseded rule may have some continuing effect on the application or validity of a current rule”
• cit- ing Edmunson v. Dept. of Ins. and Finance, 314 Or 291, 838 P2d 589 (1992

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).