Skip to main content
· 12/19/1996

Joiner v. Ohio Dep't of Transportation

Citations

  • 949 F. Supp. 562
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19439
  • 77 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 131
  • 1996 WL 748348

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “the protected activity must have 11 occurred prior to the alleged acts of retaliation”
  • granting summary judgment for failure to show adverse employment action, when plaintiff did not allege any material change in his working conditions
  • “The action of filing a complaint alleging employment discrimination with the proper state and federal agencies is clearly protected activity under Title VII”
  • loss of opportunity for overtime and loss of supervisory responsibility insufficient to establish that lateral transfer was an adverse employment action
  • no adverse employment action, despite loss of overtime and supervisory responsibilities, because no change in pay or benefits and no other conditions existed which would make working conditions intolerable
  • no “loss of prestige or an objectively demeaning change of working conditions”; new title and “the loss of opportunity for overtime and the loss of supervisory responsibility” insufficient to constitute adverse employment action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dlott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.