Johnstown Democrat Co. v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding a party’s failure to serve copies of the trial de novo request to the other party within 20 days was not strict compliance
• \requiring strict compliance with the filing requirements set forth in the rule better effectuates the Legislature's intent in enacting the statutes providing for mandatory arbitration of certain civil cases.\
• “requiring strict compliance with the filing requirements set forth in the rule better effectuates the Legislature’s intent in enacting the statutes providing for mandatory arbitration of certain civil cases”
• interpreting former MAR 7.1(a) (1989), which is substantively similar to former MAR 7.1(a) (2001)
• interpreting former MAR 7.1(a) (1989), which is substantively similar to former MAR 7.1(a) (2001)
• “[J]ust as the construction of a statute is a matter of law requiring de novo review, so is the interpretation of a court rule.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).