Skip to main content

Johnstone v. State

Citations

  • 961 S.W.2d 385
  • 1997 Tex. App. LEXIS 4159
  • 1997 WL 454098

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that defendant seeking contribution from third party could not seek contribution when plaintiffs claim against defendant sounded in contract, not tort, and when plaintiffs claims against third party would also be limited to breach of contract
  • stating that trial court must specify which of three criteria found in Section 574.034(a) forms basis of commitment order and that review is limited to criteria identified
  • .holding that evidence of patient’s repeated refusals to take medication legally insufficient to show overt act or continuing pattern of behavior despite physician’s testimony that patient’s ability to function independently would continue to deteriorate without medication
  • holding evidence of psychotic behavior and refusal to take medications insufficient
  • reversing commitment order of chronic schizophrenic patient who refused medication due to religious and cultural reasons because State failed to prove evidence of overt act or continuing pattern of behavior that demonstrated distress and patient’s inability to function independently
  • finding evidence was legally insufficient to show overt act or continuing pattern of behavior where evidence only showed patient suffered from chronic schizophrenia, auditory hallucinations, paranoid thinking, uncooperative, hostile to staff, and refused to take his medication

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Andell, Cohen, Nuchia, Schneider, Mirabal, Wilson, Taft, O'Connor, Hedges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.