Johnston v. Turner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that where no documents existed, the railroad could not obtain any interest greater than a prescriptive easement under Michigan law
• “The railroad had not merely abandoned the railway itself, but, more significantly, it had ‘manifested an intent to abandon the underlying easement’ for railway purposes when it sought ICC permission to abandon.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).