· 7/25/2005
Johnston v. South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing & Regulation
Citations
- 617 S.E.2d 363
- 365 S.C. 293
- 2005 S.C. LEXIS 219
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a provision requiring the Board to serve notice of its decision within 30 days was mandatory, but not jurisdictional
- outlining the history of this Court's restrictive view of subject matter jurisdiction
- statutes should be interpreted to further, not frustrate, legislature’s intention
- statutes should be interpreted to further, not frustrate, legislatures intention
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moore, Toal, Waller, Burnett, Pleicones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.