Skip to main content
· 7/25/2005

Johnston v. South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing & Regulation

Citations

  • 617 S.E.2d 363
  • 365 S.C. 293
  • 2005 S.C. LEXIS 219

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a provision requiring the Board to serve notice of its decision within 30 days was mandatory, but not jurisdictional
  • outlining the history of this Court's restrictive view of subject matter jurisdiction
  • statutes should be interpreted to further, not frustrate, legislature’s intention
  • statutes should be interpreted to further, not frustrate, legislature’s intention

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Toal, Waller, Burnett, Pleicones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.