Johnston v. Sims

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant had not established the extraordi nary circumstances necessary to warrant the reading of a shorter statute of limitations into the Tucker Act
• finding that supplementation was unnecessary because declarations “do not aid the court in its analysis”
• stating that GAO review should include “examin[ing] the record to ensure that the evaluation was ... in accordance with stated evaluation criteria”
• “[M]ere disagreement with the agency’s judgment concerning the adequacy of the proposal is not sufficient to establish that the agency acted unreasonably”
• “[The bidder] was required to demonstrate its capabilities within the proposal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).