Skip to main content
· 3/3/2008

Johnston v. Merit System Protection Board

Citations

  • 518 F.3d 905
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 4476
  • 2008 WL 553612

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding petitioner made protected statement when she asserted that using inadequately trained personnel to review agency training exercises would increase danger of serious injury
  • “[V]ague, conclusory[,] or facially insufficient allegations of government wrongdoing . . . fail to provide an adequate jurisdictional predicate under the [Whistleblower Protec- tion Act].”
  • listing the statute that defines “pro- tected disclosure”
  • listing the statute that defines “pro- tected disclosure”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Mayer, Gajarsa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.