Skip to main content
· 2/21/2012

Johnston v. Maha

Citations

  • 845 F. Supp. 2d 535
  • 2012 WL 612801
  • 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21599

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying de novo review in light of Amara where defendant did not demonstrate that summary document “was integrated into the plan and contained terms of the plan”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Larimer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.