· 2/21/2012
Johnston v. Maha
Citations
- 845 F. Supp. 2d 535
- 2012 WL 612801
- 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21599
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying de novo review in light of Amara where defendant did not demonstrate that summary document “was integrated into the plan and contained terms of the plan”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Larimer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.