Johnston v. Hartford Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• precluding recovery under the no-fault act because “in order to establish liability, [a vehicle] must also be used as a motor vehicle at the time of the accident” [emphasis added]
• discussing dual-function units and opining that the intent of the “as a motor vehicle” language was to restrict coverage to “motor vehicles whose function at the time of the accident was one compatible with that of a motor vehicle”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).