Johnson's Administrator v. Hogg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that because an insurer had found the plaintiff was disabled for the prior three years, the Court would expect the insurer to provide a “significant change in the circumstances of Plaintiffs condition” to support its decision to stop paying benefits
• expecting to see \some evidence of [the claimant's] medical progression at the time of [the administrator's] termination of LTD benefits\ because the administrator had awarded STD and LTD benefits for nearly three years

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).