Johnson & Wimsatt, Inc. v. Hax

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the Fourth Amendment protects an individual’s privacy interest in an automobile
• holding that a strip and body 15 cavity search of a prison visitor “may be conducted only when there is reasonable suspicion 16 [and] also demands that the person to be subjected to such an invasive search be given the 17 opportunity to depart”
• regarding as \clearly established\ the requirement that officials have reasonable suspicion before conducting strip or body cavity search of visitors, although authorities \need not secure a war- rant or have probable cause\
• reasonable suspicion satisfied where inmate-informant “had provided accurate and important information on at least one prior occasion”
• “We cannot say that the Constitution requires individualized suspicion to search a car on prison grounds, particularly if the visitor has been warned that the car is subject to search.”
• reasonable suspicion satisfied where inmate- informant \had provided accurate and important information on at least one prior occasion\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).