Skip to main content
· 10/13/2015

Johnson v. Zatecky

Citations

  • 136 S. Ct. 324
  • 193 L. Ed. 2d 235
  • 84 U.S.L.W. 3195
  • 2015 U.S. LEXIS 6421

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “We have upheld decisions to admit significantly older acts where, as here, the acts are sufficiently similar to remain probative.”
  • “There is no bright-line rule requiring the court to exclude evidence of other acts after a certain period has elapsed.” (citing Spillone, 879 F.2d at 519)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.