Johnson v. Zant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “This court has held that flight of oratory, figurative speech, and false logic are not error requiring reversal.... These may include closing argument by the district attorney characterizing a defendant as a ‘brute, beast, an animal and a mad dog who did not deserve to live.’ ”
• “This court has held that flight of oratory, figurative speech, and false logic are not error requiring reversal.... These may include closing argument .by the district .attorney characterizing a defendant as a ‘brute, beast, an animal and a mad dog who did not deserve to live.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).