Skip to main content

Johnson v. White

Citations

  • 76 Kan. 159
  • 90 P. 810
  • 1907 Kan. LEXIS 232

Syllabus

<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Wills — After-acquired Property. After-acquired property will pass under the provisions of a will, where such clearly and manifestly appears by the will to have been the intention of the testator.</p> <p>2. - Construction. A will should be construed so as to avoid intestacy, if it is reasonably possible so to do.</p> <p>3. - Intention of Testator — Circumstantial Evidence. In determining the intent of a testator the circumstances under which the will was made may be considered.</p> <p>4. - After-acquired Property. The will and surrounding circumstances in this ease examined and held clearly and manifestly to indicate an intent on the part of the testator that after-acquired property should pass thereunder.</p>

Judges: Graves

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.