Johnson v. White
Citations
- 76 Kan. 159
- 90 P. 810
- 1907 Kan. LEXIS 232
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Wills — After-acquired Property. After-acquired property will pass under the provisions of a will, where such clearly and manifestly appears by the will to have been the intention of the testator.</p> <p>2. - Construction. A will should be construed so as to avoid intestacy, if it is reasonably possible so to do.</p> <p>3. - Intention of Testator — Circumstantial Evidence. In determining the intent of a testator the circumstances under which the will was made may be considered.</p> <p>4. - After-acquired Property. The will and surrounding circumstances in this ease examined and held clearly and manifestly to indicate an intent on the part of the testator that after-acquired property should pass thereunder.</p>
Judges: Graves
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Zabel v. StewartSupreme Court of Kansas· 1941-01-25· cited 38×
- Springer v. SchnackSupreme Court of Kansas· 1942-11-07· cited 18×
- Giese v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas· 1965-12-11· cited 15×
- Daily v. MooreSupreme Court of Kansas· 1944-04-08· cited 15×
- Knox v. KnoxSupreme Court of Kansas· 1912-06-08· cited 10×
- In Re Estate of BreckleinCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1981-12-03· cited 9×
- Stubling v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court· 1907-07-02· cited 9×
- In Re Estate of DobrovolnySupreme Court of Kansas· 1957-12-07· cited 7×
- Votapka v. VotapkaSupreme Court of Kansas· 1932-10-08· cited 6×
- Twist v. TwistSupreme Court of Kansas· 1914-03-07· cited 5×
- Silverman v. LarsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1927-10-08· cited 1×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.