Johnson v. Wait

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an argument that a jury instruction was an incorrect statement of law was waived on appeal because that argument was not raised in the trial court
• stating that the purpose of Trial Rule 51(C) is to guarantee timely objections to afford the trial court the opportunity to correct an erroneous instruction before giving it to the jury
• noting Comparative Fault Act does not apply to claims under the Medical Malpractice Act
• noting Comparative Fault Act does not apply to claims under the Medical Malpractice Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).