Skip to main content
· 4/1/2004

Johnson v. Ventling

Citations

  • 132 S.W.3d 173
  • 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 2917
  • 2004 WL 690798

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \We hold that Ventling's challenge to the enforceability of the decree in this proceeding amounted to an impermissible collateral attack.\
  • “We hold that Ventling’s challenge to the enforceability of the decree in this proceeding amounted to an impermissible collateral attack.”
  • \We hold that Ventling's challenge to the enforceability of the decree in this proceeding amounted to an impermissible collateral attack.\
  • “We hold that Ventling’s challenge to the enforceability of the decree in this proceeding amounted to an impermissible collateral attack.”
  • “We hold that Ventling’s challenge to the enforceability of the decree in this proceeding amounted to an impermissible collateral attack.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hinojosa, Castillo, Chavez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.