Skip to main content
· 11/25/1980

Johnson v. Utah State Retirement Office

Citations

  • 621 P.2d 1234
  • 1980 Utah LEXIS 1070

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “the mere introduction of a constitutional issue” does not necessarily “obviate the need for exhaustion of administrative remedies”
  • stating that “[a]dministrative agencies do not generally determine the constitutionality of their organic legislation”
  • \Exhaustion of administrative remedies may not be necessary when it would serve no useful purpose.\
  • plaintiffs sought “payment of benefits paid into the retirement system on plaintiffs’ behalf”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stewart, Crockett, Maughan, Wilkins, Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.