Johnson v. United States Office of Personnel Management

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an injury-in-fact is “fairly traceable” if it results from the defendant’s alleged conduct
• holding that an injury is “fairly traceable” if it results from the defendant’s alleged conduct
• concluding that the possibility of reputational harm was “much too ‘conjectural or hypothetical’ to constitute the type of concrete injury that is required to establish Article III standing”
• holding that an OPM rule requiring senators and congressional staff to obtain health insurance under the Affordable Care Act did not create a private right “of equal treatment” with a senator’s constituents
• holding that “a polit- ical figure’s assertion, without more, that the receipt . . . [of] a benefit will hurt his or her reputation . . . is insufficient to es- tablish standing”
• holding that “a polit- ical figure’s assertion, without more, that the receipt . . . [of] a benefit will hurt his or her reputation . . . is insufficient to es- tablish standing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).