Johnson v. United Parcel Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that false imprisonment requires the use or threat of force and that the restraint from an individual’s fear of losing a job is insufficient as a matter of law for such a claim
• the plaintiff’s false imprisonment claim was disposed of on summary judgment where the plaintiff’s employer questioned the plaintiff during the evening hours about three or four hours concerning allegations of theft and drug dealing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Carter v. Aramark Sports & Entertainment Services, Inc.
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2003-11-06· cited 52×
• Hanna v. Marshall Field & Co.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-03-29· cited 20×
• Henderson v. Claire's Stores, Inc.
  D. Maryland· 2009-04-08· cited 15×
• Coates v. United Parcel Services, Inc.
  D. Maryland· 1996-08-19· cited 6×

Other cases named Johnson v. United Parcel Services, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Johnson v. United Parcel Services, Inc.
  D. Maryland· 1989-09-13· cited 1×