Johnson v. UNIFIED RESIDENTIAL DEV. CO.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• use of the name “Unified Residential, Inc.,” in the contracts at issue, rather than “Unified Residential Dev. Co., Inc.,” constitutes “a mere misnomer that does not render [the agreements] unenforceable,” given that the “identity of the corporation was properly proved”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).