Skip to main content
· 3/26/2009

Johnson v. U.K. Government

Citations

  • 608 F. Supp. 2d 291
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26455
  • 2009 WL 814943

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing claims because the pro se plaintiff did “not allege that any of the statutory exceptions to the FSIA apply”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Janet C. Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.