Skip to main content
· 10/12/1953

Johnson v. Teets

Citations

  • 346 U.S. 839

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that judges acted as enforcers in a statutory scheme that gave them, instead of the parole board, the unilateral power to parole prisoners without any procedural constraints
  • asking whether the judges are “neutral adjudicators” or “enforcers”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.