Johnson v. Stryker Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Act protects landowners whose property is used gratuitously, with or without permission, for recreational purposes
• “we cannot adopt the restrictive holding of Miller,” i.e., that the Use Act does not apply to property subject to the later-enacted Licensing Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).