Skip to main content
· 10/7/2013

Johnson v. States

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 114
  • 187 L. Ed. 2d 83
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3181
  • 571 U.S. 849

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ERISA preempts claims that require the Court to interpret the terms of the benefits plan
  • “We must defer to a state court’s in- terpretation of the state’s statute.”
  • “We must defer to a state court’s in- terpretation of the state’s statute.”
  • “We must defer to a state court’s in- terpretation of the state’s statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.