Johnson v. STATE HRS

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a party may assert inconsistent claims in the same pleading even when the claims are mutually exclusive
• affirming dismissal of malicious claim against a municipality under Section 768.28(9)(a) because “ ‘Malice is not only an essential element of malicious prosecution; it is the gist of such a cause of action.’ ”
• “While we think it a better practice to have separated the alternative allegations in separate counts, we do not find the manner in which the complaint is structured to be a proper basis for dismissal.”
• a party may assert mutually exclusive claims in the same pleading

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).