Skip to main content

Johnson v. State

Citations

  • 381 A.2d 303
  • 38 Md. App. 306
  • 1977 Md. App. LEXIS 374

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • statements offered to prove the future actions of a codefendant were inadmissible
  • “ ‘[Evidence of declarations of a plan, design or intention presently entertained by the declarant is ... admissible when offered as evidence that the design was carried out by acts or omissions of the declar-ant’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Morton, Mason, Wllner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.