Skip to main content

Johnson v. State

Citations

  • 450 N.E.2d 123
  • 1983 Ind. App. LEXIS 3009

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Knowledge of a possible penalty for refusal to submit to the test is not so inherently coercive as to negate [the defendant’s] consent.”
  • “Knowledge of a possible penalty for refusal to submit to the test is not so inherently coercive as to negate [the defendant’s] consent.”
  • “Knowledge of a possible penalty for refusal to submit to the test is not so inherently coercive as to negate [the defendant’s] consent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Staton, Hoffman, Garrard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.