Indiana Court of Appeals· 3/4/2004
Johnson v. State
Citations
- 804 N.E.2d 255
- 2004 Ind. App. LEXIS 334
- 2004 WL 396307
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- proposing a model statute permitting force that does not result in physical injury to the extent the force does not place the child at certain substantial risk and defining physical injury to exclude “transient red marks or temporary pain”
- uncorroborated testimony of one witness may be sufficient by itself to sustain conviction on appeal
- testimony of single witness, who was not the victim, was sufficient to support conviction of battery
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sharpnack, Mathias, Vaidik
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Willis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2008-06-10· cited 45×
- Mitchell v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2004-08-16· cited 18×
- State v. LefevreNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2005-06-27· cited 17×
- Francisco Garcia v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2017-03-13
- Dante Gooch v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2021-01-13
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Stewart v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2002-05-24· cited 116×
- C.T.S. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2003-01-29· cited 54×
- Toney v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1999-08-20· cited 46×
- Smith v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1986-02-24· cited 18×
- Tucker v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2000-03-14· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.