Court of Appeals of Texas· 7/12/2007
Johnson v. State
Citations
- 233 S.W.3d 420
- 2007 Tex. App. LEXIS 5483
- 2007 WL 2013061
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the finding of “NONE” regarding the affirmative deadly weapon finding was an express statement that no such finding was made within the trial court’s discretion and judicial reasoning
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Livingston, Gardner, McCoy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- McCallum v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2010-01-27· cited 33×
- Derek Maurice Roots v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2013-12-19· cited 21×
- Silvestre Cortez Romero v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2013-06-11· cited 18×
- Towery v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2008-09-04· cited 17×
- Guerrero v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2009-10-29· cited 7×
- Willie Earl Hall Jr. v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2012-06-14· cited 7×
- Loud v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2011-01-06· cited 5×
- Belinda Barrow v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2015-07-17
- Jacob Velez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2009-11-04
- Doshee Towery v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2008-09-04
- Keith Hightower v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2009-07-10
- Julian J. Guerrero v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2009-10-29
- in Re Douglas H. RobertsTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2012-08-17
- Ex Parte Danish SheikhTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2012-08-17
- Alex Terrelldevon Jackson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2013-03-26
- Ex Parte Woodrow MillerTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2013-02-28
- Christopher Dante Loud v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2010-12-07
- Vera Elizabeth Guthrie-Nail v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2014-01-08
- Alan Leslie Balderamos v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2014-03-13
- Glen Edward Farmer v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2013-06-26
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Polk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-05-22· cited 460×
- State v. BatesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-12-14· cited 218×
- Ex Parte HuskinsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2005-11-02· cited 204×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-06-20· cited 133×
- LaFleur v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2003-05-21· cited 125×
- Homan v. HughesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-04-23· cited 121×
- Ex Parte DoppsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-04-30· cited 104×
- Ex Parte GriffinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-10-31· cited 82×
- Shaw v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-02-11· cited 80×
- Silva v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1999-04-21· cited 74×
- Ex Parte EmpeyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-09-14· cited 67×
- Hooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-06-09· cited 60×
- Ex Parte DickersonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-01-29· cited 51×
- Smith v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2000-03-28· cited 50×
- Ex Parte FranklinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-09-21· cited 46×
- Alexander v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1993-11-03· cited 35×
- Fanniel v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2002-04-18· cited 35×
- Marshall v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1993-06-24· cited 32×
- Chaney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-05-23· cited 31×
- Campos v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 1996-07-17· cited 30×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.