Skip to main content

Johnson v. State

Citations

  • 648 N.E.2d 666
  • 1995 Ind. App. LEXIS 304
  • 1995 WL 126325

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that because \the State must prove engagement in a repeated or continuing course of conduct militates against arbitrary enforcement\ of Indiana's stalking statute
  • stalking statute not unconstitutionally vague; statute included both a scienter requirement and a reasonableness requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robertson, Najam, Barteau

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.