Johnson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “a ruling as to the admissibility of such photographs will not be disturbed in absence of a showing that the admission thereof constituted an abuse of discretion under the circumstances.”
• fact that statement of code-fendant inculpated defendant did not require severance where codefendant testified and was available for cross-examination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Crum v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1981-04-16· cited 34×
• Stanley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-03-21· cited 25×
• Taylor v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-09-11· cited 5×
• Fernandez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-05-01· cited 1×
• State v. Enriquez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-02-17· cited 1×
• Naylor v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-01-19· cited 1×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bruton v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-17· cited 8,792×
• Garmise v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-04-08· cited 38×
• Bauldree v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1973-10-10· cited 25×
• Manson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1956-05-23· cited 23×
• Ballard v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-12-09· cited 14×
• MacK v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-06-14· cited 9×
• Allen v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-12-20· cited 7×
• Elias v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-10-02· cited 6×
• Carey v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-02-07· cited 1×