Johnson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that insufficiency of evidence not cognizable in postconviction claim
• noting that claims of prosecutorial misconduct are not cognizable in a collateral postconviction motion
• identifying prosecutorial misconduct, insufficiency of the evidence, and trial court error as issues that should have been raised on direct appeal and are not cognizable in a collateral postconviction motion
• “[P]rosecutorial misconduct, insufficiency of the evidence ..., and trial court error, are not cognizable in a collateral postconviction motion.”
• “[P]rosecutorial misconduct, insufficiency of the evidence . . ., and trial court error[] are not cognizable in a collateral postconviction motion.”
• a claim of trial court error is not cognizable in a Rule 3.850 motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Melvin L. Pryear v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-02-28· cited 3×
• Jessie Floyd v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-10-31· cited 2×
• Hamilton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-06-05
• Michael Dunn v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-09-09
• Jay Arthur Kelly v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-10-21
• Johnson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-02-26

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Hearns
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2007-04-26· cited 186×
• Smith v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1983-11-10· cited 67×
• Tumblin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-09-26· cited 20×