Johnson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he general rule is that a common-law court has no right to strike out or modify a judgment, upon motion made after the expiration of the term ... [except] for fraud, surprise or mistake.”
• “[T]he general rule is that a common-law court has no right to strike out or modify a judgment, upon motion made after the expiration of the term ... [except] for fraud, surprise or mistake.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ruby v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-02-22· cited 34×
• State v. Tull
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1965-08-20· cited 28×
• Giles v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1963-05-06· cited 12×
• Todd v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-09-09· cited 12×
• Skok v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-12-07· cited 7×
• Johns v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1958-03-27· cited 6×
• Pitt v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-04-09· cited 4×
• Carr v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1958-11-24· cited 3×
• Ruby v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-04-30· cited 2×
• State v. Thomas
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2024-08-29· cited 1×