Johnson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial judge calling victim “sugar” did not seriously affect the fairness or integrity of the proceedings
• trial judge calling victim “sugar” did not seriously affect the fairness or integrity of the proceedings
• trial court properly excluded evidence that detective offered defendant a polygraph examination and that defendant accepted the offer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ford v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2005-07-11· cited 16×
• Moore v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-02-15· cited 9×
• Parfenuk v. the State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2016-07-13· cited 8×
• Claritt v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-06-16· cited 6×
• Keown v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2005-08-17· cited 5×
• State v. Calvin Hill
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2021-10-08
• Justin Idelle Moore v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-02-15

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lajara v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1993-10-18· cited 126×
• Paul v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2000-10-02· cited 83×
• Moore v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2004-09-27· cited 51×
• Cammon v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1998-05-18· cited 44×
• Brown v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1985-06-14· cited 44×
• Gay v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2002-12-13· cited 17×
• Barrett v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2002-10-28· cited 13×
• Keller v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1993-05-03· cited 5×