Skip to main content

Johnson v. State

Citations

  • 388 So. 2d 1088

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that testimony of out-of-court statement to defendant, offered only to show its effect upon defendant's state of mind, was not hearsay and should have been admitted
  • proof of statements made to defendant relevant and admissible to determine defendant's state of mind as to whether she knew or should have known that property was stolen

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hubbart, C.J., and Schwartz and Baskin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.