Mississippi Supreme Court· 8/19/1987
Johnson v. State
Citations
- 512 So. 2d 1246
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming the decision below and concluding that the trial court’s findings were supported, in part, by its observations of the defendant, evincing his English competency
- affirming the decision below and concluding that the trial court's findings were supported, in part, by its observations of the defendant, evincing his English competency
- “ if the trial court determines at a suppression hearing prior to trial that the statements contain ‘particularized guarantees of trustworthiness’ . . . that is, that the statements corroborate one another on the core details of the crime,” then the statement is admissible
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Roy Noble Lee, P.J., and Dan M. Lee and Griffin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hansen v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1991-12-18· cited 521×
- Chase v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1994-02-24· cited 466×
- Evans v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1997-09-11· cited 404×
- Holland v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1997-09-11· cited 380×
- Simmons v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 2001-12-13· cited 301×
- Faraga v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1987-07-29· cited 301×
- Shell v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1989-11-29· cited 276×
- Bell v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1998-12-14· cited 275×
- Minnick v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1988-12-14· cited 249×
- Holly v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1996-02-08· cited 206×
- Smith v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 2008-06-26· cited 195×
- Jefferson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1989-11-22· cited 174×
- Chamberlin v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 2008-07-17· cited 119×
- Jaco v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1990-12-19· cited 115×
- King v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 2003-09-18· cited 95×
- Scott v. BallMississippi Supreme Court· 1992-02-26· cited 90×
- Payton v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1999-08-26· cited 57×
- Boyd v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1988-04-27· cited 57×
- Strahan v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1998-07-23· cited 48×
- Cavett v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1998-07-23· cited 44×
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lee v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1986-06-03· cited 1,066×
- Cruz v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1987-04-21· cited 734×
- Neal v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1984-05-23· cited 666×
- Billiot v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1984-06-06· cited 479×
- Gilliard v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1983-02-16· cited 276×
- Newell v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1975-01-27· cited 242×
- Winters v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1985-07-24· cited 100×
- Duckworth v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1985-08-07· cited 85×
- Cabello v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1986-05-28· cited 48×
- Blanks v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1984-06-06· cited 31×
- Brown v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1976-11-30· cited 29×
- Bullock v. HARPOLE, S. ST. PENITENTIARYMississippi Supreme Court· 1958-05-12· cited 25×
- Seales v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1986-09-24· cited 25×
- Mitchell v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1986-09-24· cited 24×
- Scott v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1882-10-15· cited 20×
- Carter v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1985-07-24· cited 15×
- Carter v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1976-05-25· cited 15×
- Rigby v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1986-03-12· cited 14×
- Williams v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1984-08-29· cited 11×
- Burkhalter v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1974-11-04· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.