Johnson v. Sorensen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]t is clear that a plaintiff’s reasonable reliance is an essential element of a suppression claim.”
• “Although the term ‘inducement’ has often been used in the description of the [third] element of suppression, it is clear that a plaintiff’s ‘reasonable reliance’ is an essential element of a suppression claim.”
• “[A] plaintiff’s [‘reasonable reliance’] is an essential element of a suppression claim.”
• discussing unenforceable contract with public university based on immunity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).