Johnson v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is the allegation in the complaint that notice has been afforded the state pursuant to the requirements of the Act which confers jurisdiction on the court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Urban Renewal Agency v. Lackey
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1976-05-13· cited 77×
• Gardner v. First Escrow Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-03-20· cited 23×
• Pickett v. Washington County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-12-19· cited 18×
• Espinosa v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-05-05· cited 15×
• Yunker v. Mathews
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-02-13· cited 13×
• Adams v. Oregon State Police
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1979-06-18· cited 2×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Smith v. JC Penney Company, Inc.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1974-09-09· cited 35×
• Vancil v. Poulson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1964-01-22· cited 26×
• Rohde v. State Industrial Accident Commission
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1923-07-24· cited 24×
• Fry v. Willamalane Park & Recreation District
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1971-02-25· cited 22×
• Sellers v. Looper
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1972-12-07· cited 8×
• Paul v. McCudden
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1970-07-09· cited 8×