Johnson v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Although Johnson did not seek a diagnosis . . . until July 30, 1991, after the expiration of the thirty-six month period on July 6, 1989, this fact does not preclude a finding that a disability existed during the thirty-six month period.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Metro MacHine Corp. v. Lamb
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2000-08-15· cited 24×
• Southwest Virginia Tire, Inc. v. Bryant
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2000-02-29· cited 15×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hungerford Mechanical Corp. v. Hobson
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1991-02-19· cited 248×
• Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1990-06-19· cited 14×
• Molash v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1986-10-07· cited 11×