Johnson v. Sinclair Refining Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• prohibiting an insurer’s subrogation claims 4 against its insured, in part because subrogation would permit the insurer to “pass 5 the incidence of the loss . . . from itself to its own insured” (alteration in original) 6 (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).