Johnson v. Scaccetti

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that such damages “are not susceptible to scientific precision ... because there is no neat formula for translating pain and suffering into monetary compensation”
• noting that “the primaiy aim of the various no-fault statutory schemes has been to achieve lower premiums and prompt payment of medical expenses” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
• noting that \the primary aim of the various no-fault statutory schemes has been to achieve lower premiums and prompt payment of medical expenses\ (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
• finding a remittitur unjustified even though the jury’s award was “undoubtedly high, perhaps overly generous”
• “[T]he legislature knows how to express its disagreement with ease law by amending a statute if it believes a court has misconstrued its intent”
• \Legislature knows how to express its disagreement with case law by amending a statute if it believes a court has misconstrued its intent.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).