Johnson v. Sartain

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that receipt of medical evidence was an informal claim for increased compensation and VA’s failure to send a formal application form to the claimant tolled the one-year filing period
• stating that § 3.157 (b) does not require the veteran to identify the report as a claim or to identify the benefits sought
• stating that § 3.157(b) does not require the veteran to identify the report as a claim or to identify the benefits sought
• holding VA medical examination report constituted an informal claim for total disability based on individual unemployability
• precluding the VA from asserting on remand that a claimant's informal claim was \not a cognizable claim for effective-date purposes\
• finding no evidence that the Secretary fulfilled his statutory duty pursuant to 38 C.F.R. § 3.155(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).