Skip to main content
· 7/15/1886

Johnson v. Roanoke Land & Improvement Co.

Citations

  • 82 Va. 284
  • 1886 Va. LEXIS 31

Syllabus

<p>Equitable Jurisdiction and Belief—Remedy at law—Case at bar— Contract, clause eight, reads: “No work shall be considered extra . unless a separate estimate in writing for the same be submitted by the contractor to the architect and their signatures be obtained thereto.” Contractor was entitled to, and demanded, but could not. get copy of contract until work was completed; during progress whereof, various alterations in the plans.were piade by employer, which he refused to pay for, because not made according to clause ' eight. Contractor brought covenant. Objection was sustained ' against any evidence as to alterations, for that reason. The action was dismissed ; and contractor brought his bill for an account and general relief. The bill was dismissed on demurrer. On .appeal—</p> <p>Held:</p> <p>Employer having successfully obstructed contractor’s remedy at law, the latter is entitled to relief in a court of equity. Radcliffe v. High, 2 Rob. 271.</p>

Judges: Lewis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.