Johnson v. Riverplex International

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming trial court's exclusion of certain expert testimony elicited at trial but not found in answers to interrogatories and stating seasonable supplementation requires supplementation when new information renders initial response inadequate
• affirming trial court's exclusion of certain expert testimony elicited at trial but not found in answers to interrogatories and stating seasonable supplementation requires supplementation when new information renders initial response inadequate
• affirming trial court's exclusion of certain expert testimony elicited at trial but not found in answers to interrogatories and stating seasonable supplementation requires supplementation when new information renders initial response inadequate
• where plaintiff did not establish that her expert, an oncologist, was familiar with the standard of care of a gastroenterologist, expert's testimony was properly stricken
• where plaintiff did not establish that her expert, an oncologist, was familiar with the standard of care of a gastroenterologist, expert’s testimony was properly stricken

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).