Skip to main content
· 7/23/1965

Johnson v. R. E. Tapley, Inc.

Citations

  • 136 N.W.2d 538
  • 272 Minn. 19
  • 1965 Minn. LEXIS 629

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Defendants were not obliged to anticipate that the mere fact [that plaintiff] had to pass display windows as she left defendants’ store would excite 7 anything more than an indifferent interest on the part of plaintiff.” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Otis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.