Skip to main content
· 4/28/1982

Johnson v. R & D ENTERPRISES

Citations

  • 435 N.E.2d 1233
  • 106 Ill. App. 3d 496
  • 62 Ill. Dec. 261
  • 1982 Ill. App. LEXIS 1859

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the compulsory insurance doctrine to a policy issued to satisfy the Illinois Motor Carrier of Property Law and noting that “[t]he purpose behind th[e] [Law’s insurance] requirement is indicated by the heading of the paragraph ‘Security for the protection of the public.’”
  • applying the compulsory insurance doctrine to a policy issued to satisfy the Illinois Motor Carrier of Property Law and noting that “[t]he purpose behind th[e] [Law’s insurance] requirement is indicated by the heading of the paragraph ‘Security for the protection of the public.’”
  • applying the compulsory insurance doctrine to a policy issued to satisfy the Illinois Motor Carrier of Property Law and noting that “[t]he purpose behind th[e] [Law’s insurance] requirement is indicated by the heading of the paragraph ‘Security for the protection of the public.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.