Skip to main content
· 4/5/1921

Johnson v. Prineville

Citations

  • 100 Or. 119
  • 196 P. 821
  • 1921 Ore. LEXIS 101

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • no interference where plaintiff and defendant “had a mutual economic interest in delivering” the product or service and “were dependent upon each other to do so.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bean, Benson, Brown, Bubnett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.