Johnson v. Pate

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “This marked difference in quality lessens the likelihood of consumers’ misapprehending the source of either product”
• “barrier between the two [markets] is sufficiently porous to allow Charles of the Ritz passage with little difficulty.”
• “[E]vidence of intentional copying raises a presumption that the second comer intended to create a confusing similarity.” (citation omitted)
• considering extensive advertising a factor in finding a strong mark

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).